Tuesday, 9 December 2014

New Year Resolution for Separated and Feuding Couples

With Christmas around the corner, the start to a new year is also not too far off. For many the new year is about starting afresh, putting the old behind and looking forward to the new. It is the same for those who have separated. 

If you have been stuck in the rut with your ex about settling property matters, now is the time to do it. 

What you have to ask yourself is does it really matter if you have to give a little to bring things to an end or are you hanging on for a reason? 

Sometimes people simply carry on the fight so as not to end the relationship, as signing off on property (or children orders) on a final basis means the relationship has well and truly come to an end. There will no longer be a need to communicate with your ex once you both sign on the dotted line and agree to orders. 

This can be a scary thing for some. Whilst ever there is a fight about property or children there is contact with your partner, all be it unpleasant contact (most of the time). But it is still contact. You are continuing your relationship, just in a different way to before. 

It is exactly for this reason you should take the bull by the horn and make your new year resolution to start afresh. And starting afresh means you need to let go of the old. Remember the saying out with the old and in with the new?

How can you meet someone else while you are embroiled in bitter family law proceedings or simply still arguing with your ex about how property should be divided? And if you have met someone else already they may be tired of you going on and on about how awful your ex is and also want you to move on. Lets face it, no one wants to continuously hear about the other partner's ex spouse. 

So if you are in need of a new year's resolution and you have not sorted out matters between you and your ex, now is the time. 

Let bygones be bygones and move on. It will be worth it. Just think who you will feel when the clock strikes midnight on the 31st of December 2014 and a the new year starts and it will be ex spouse free? 

Hopefully care free and fantastic, ready to embrace the world and face any challenge thrown your way. 

Go for it. 

Tuesday, 11 November 2014

Family Court System underfunded

According to the KPMG report the Family Court system is underfunded and thus under resourced.

No doubt most lawyers could have told you this before the report, with cases taking up to two years to make their way through the system to a final hearing.

And of course what most lawyers also know is that this type of delay is not good for anyone, particularly the people who rely on this system to make a decision for them.

What does this latest news mean? No doubt more delay.

Some sources say that over the next year twelve judges are due to retire, with no replacements for them on the horizon. It is believed that waiting times will go out to three years.

So not only do people face enormous financial strain by going to the family court, with people spending in excess of twenty thousand dollars to get to final hearing, but they have to wait years for their case to be heard.

It is no wonder some people are turning to divorce mediation as an alternative.

There are organisations like Relationships Australia offering mediation and there are private mediators.

Bass Bay Mediation is one such private mediation service who run their business from the Mornington Peninsula.

www.bassbaymediation.com.au

Surely a solution arrived at by the two parties to the dispute would be better than one imposed on them by a judge after waiting two to three years?



Wednesday, 29 October 2014

Being Child Focused during Separation


The current phrase in disputes involving children after separation seems to be the phrase ‘child focused’. Clients are constantly reminded to be child focused when thinking about arrangements for the children. It can be difficult though to be child focused in highly emotional times. Often parties think they are child focused when they are not.  

This is by no means surprising. The time when people are separating is the time when sane people do crazy things. Peaceful citizens can turn into angry roaring lions [metaphorically speaking].

Imagine the following scenario (totally fictitious)

Darren comes home early from work after having had a beer or two with his work mates and his wife’s mobile telephone beeps just as he walks in the front door. Without thinking he picks it up and looks at it, the words ‘honey you have a message,’ frozen on his tongue as he reads the rather private words of ‘can’t wait to be with you again’.

When he finds his voice he yells something like ‘how long’s this bein goin on you slut?’ Language might even be stronger than that but we do not want to offend readers.

She of course does not hold back either.

‘Who do you think you are snooping through my phone? When was the last time I looked at your phone? That’s right. I don’t. I respect your privacy. Do you even know what that is, or how to spell it? You useless bastard. Come in here half drunk and expect to tell me what I can and cannot do. When was the last time you listened to me or even looked at me or took me serious?’ There is a pause as she snatches the phone away from him. ‘At least Erik listens to me and appreciates me, which is more than I can say about you.’

Taken aback Darren grabs a beer and heads outside into his shed, seeking solace amongst the half naked woman plastered all over his walls. At least they don’t talk back.

Days later Darren has moved out, after Jenny his wife, locked him out. The police arrive and have to escort him off the premises, giving him a stern warning not to make a nuisance of himself again and not to threaten his ex wife and children.

Darren cannot believe it. It is his house. He paid for it. What is she doing?

Now he wants to see the kids. They are ten and eight.

‘Well, where are you living?’ Snaps Jenny into the phone, juggling shopping, opening a door and kids fighting.

Scratching is head and other parts of his body, Darren is reluctant to answer this.

‘What’s it to you?’ he says instead.

‘I want to know where the girls will be.’ Jenny does not even try to hide her impatience.

‘With me,’ replied Darren starting to get irritated. The police have already been to see him once to warn him about his behavior and language.

‘Yes, I know that,’ replies Jenny. ‘But where will you be?’

“What is this the Spanish inquisition?’ Darren starts to pace the room of his small flat. He does not want Jenny to know where he’s living. It’s the principle. And if he does not want to tell her he won’t. He does not ask her where she’s been every second of the day, nor where she went last weekend. He knows she was not at home.

Ten minutes later Darren hangs up on Jenny muttering fucking bitch under his breath, hoping she has not heard him.

Another ten minutes later the police knock on his door. Clearly she had heard him.

Several months later Darren spends supervised time with his daughters at a contact centre and is trying to find the ten thousand dollars his lawyer has asked him to pay into trust so he can see his girls more.

Darren cannot understand the system or how he, who used to be a hands on dad, has ended up where he is.


Analysis

Arguably neither Darren nor Jenny are acting terribly child focused.

Jenny would have to accept that Darren is the daughter’s father and needs to spend time with them.

If she has genuine fears about the girls safety there would be things she could do, such as offer day time contact only to start off with, until the parties perhaps had a chance to attend mediation to sort out things like why does Jenny want to know where Darren is living and why does he not want to tell her.

Equally Darren could be a bit more proactive and instead of stalking Jenny and his daughters make sure he has living quarters that are suitable for children. If he has a place where each girl has her own room (and or they share a room), with their own bed and clothing etc, there is really no reason why his ex wife cannot know where he lives.

Both parties in this case have taken a particular position without appreciating what their position is doing to their children. They too are caught in their parents turmoil and probably trying to work out how they fit into it.

Lessons to be learned

The Family Court provides some useful information to separating couples, including a form called a parenting questionnaire, which you can find by clicking on this link.


You do not have to be at court to use this form. If there is a dispute between you and your ex about the arrangements for children you may find it useful to sit down and fill out the form to work out what arrangements would be in the best interest of the children and what arrangements would work.

You will see that the form asks things like, ‘how far is it from work to the school the children attend, how do you propose to look after them after school, will you need after school care,’ etc. All practical things one needs to think about when making a proposal about the amount of time one wants to spend with the children or if you want the children to live with you.

The principles about matters the court has to take into account when determining what is in the children’s best interest can be found in section60CC of the Family Law act.

Remember, an agreement reached between you and your ex [say by attending mediation] has to be better than an order by a judge who will only ever see one piece of the 10,000 piece puzzle called your family life.

For mediators around Melbourne try these websites




And, if you are in a dispute with your ex about the children, try and take a step back once in a while and see if both of you are acting in the children’s best interest or if emotions are ruling the decision making. 

Tuesday, 9 September 2014

Navigating the Application for Consent Orders Form

In our last post we briefly touched on those fortunate people who manage to agree how to divide up their property and are simply looking for a way to finalise this.

It was suggested that the best way for this to occur is to use the form titled Application for Consent Orders together with the minute of order, both of which can be found on the family court web site.

The application form can be somewhat daunting with its 38 pages, but do not fear, it is not that complicated.

The first part is all about providing some information about you and your ex spouse. Basic information including date of birth (of you and your ex spouse), date you started living together as well as date of marriage (if applicable) and date of separation.

Other information you need to disclose is if there are currently other proceedings afoot in relation to family violence, information about any current orders and if either of you or your spouse are bankrupt (to name but a few of the questions).

Once you have completed this part of the form you make your way to part H, where you will need to provide information about income, assets, liabilities and superannuation.

As far as income is concerned you do not need to include any centreline payments. Income is purely what you receive pursuant to a wage.

Under property you and your ex spouse need to set out your current assets. By current assets the form means assets you each own now together or separate. If you are using this form some years after separation and have purchased property in your sole name this will need to be included.

If you own the family home together as joint tenants, you will each own it 50%. Do not set out the assets in this part pursuant to any agreement you have reached. For example, if your ex spouse is to receive the former matrimonial home do not list it just under your ex spouse but as the two of you owning it.

Similarly, if an asset is owned on paper in the name of the other person (the one not receiving it), you will need to list it though as if it was an assets of the person whose name it is legally registered in.

Take care with this section as you a duty to the court and to your ex spouse to comply with full and frank disclosure about your financial situation. Not listing an asset can be a costly mistake if your ex spouse finds out later and decides to have the orders set aside for lack of disclosure.

In our next post we will look at listing current liabilities and superannuation interests.

In the meantime you can find the do it yourself kit by clicking not his link:

http://www.familylawcourts.gov.au/wps/wcm/resources/file/eb7d904c3b27c0b/AppConsentOrders_Kit_070612_V1.pdf

Sunday, 31 August 2014

Property Settlement by Agreement

We have reached agreement what now?

There are of course plenty of people who are able to agree about their division of property (house, furniture, cash etc.) and never need to see a lawyer. As a lawyer we would never hear about such cases.

If you fall into this category, congratulations.

Reaching agreement however is only the first step.

It can pay to still formalize your agreement. The most cost effective way for you to do this is by way of Application for consent orders and Minute of Order.

Both these documents can be found at the Family Court Web Site.

They look daunting, but are effective and best of all you do not need to see a lawyer. The two of you can do it by yourself.

The other way people often talk of formalizing their agreement is by way of binding financial agreement. This way though both of you will need to obtain independent legal advice, which will be costly.

Both the consent order form and the minute of order will be filed with the court and final property orders will be made. You can use this form for children orders as well.

For financial orders you need to fill in your financial situation now, not at separation.

In our next posts we will look at filling out the form in more detail.

In the meantime you can follow these links to have a look at both documents:


and



Wednesday, 20 August 2014

Contributions

When a relationship comes to an end and the need arises to divide up property, contributions of the parties are examined closely. Sometimes too closely.

There are different types of contributions:

Direct financial contributions
  •  amount of money each party had before the relationship
  • wages
  • lotto winnings
  • payouts such as termination or workers compensation 
  • money received from inheritance
Indirect financial contributions
  • getting money for a deposit to purchase a house from a relative (parents or grandparents);
  • having relatives pay the mortgage/rent to help out in tough times during the relationship
Direct non financial contributions
  •  looking after the house and garden
  • looking after the children
  • cooking the meals, ironing the shirts etc.

 Indirect non financial contributions
  • getting help from relatives to renovate
A court will want to know who made the contributions and when.

Usually both parties are considered to have contributed equally to the relationship during the relationship even if one party stayed home and the other went to work.

If one of you received a pay out during the relationship or an inheritance, this will also be taken into account in a property settlement.

What can be important is if one party had a higher initial direct financial contribution to the purchase of property.

Something else the court can take into account is wastage. We will look at wastage in another post.

Determining contributions is only one step in determining property settlement.

It is not unusual for parties to disagree about the type of contributions each of them made and their worth, particularly if one party was the home maker.

If your case is that you made a greater initial direct financial contribution your case will be stronger if you can support this claim by independent evidence including bank statements etc. Of  course sometimes this can be difficult, particularly if the relationship has lasted longer than ten years, with most people only keeping their financial records for the minimum amount of time required.

Remember that in all property cases there is a requirement for full and frank disclosure.

The implications of not complying with full and frank disclosure will be dealt with in our next post.

Don't forget to get independent legal advice for your own case if you are unsure what to do next.  


Tuesday, 1 July 2014

We only live together

If you have been through a painful and costly divorce you may not want to repeat the experience ever again. And who could blame you?

Unfortunately though, simply living together with someone may not necessarily protect you from further heartache, nor your hip pocket should things not work out.

Since 2009 the Family Court now also has jurisdiction to hear property disputes between de-facto couples. It pays to look at the definition of de-facto to be absolutely clear what you may have to disprove or prove in future court proceedings.

You can find the definition of a de-fcto couple here.

http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/fla1975114/s4aa.html

It will not surprise you to learn that these days many people argue they were not in a de-facto relationship before they even argue about what is a fair property settlement.

So, is the answer not living together with this new found love of your life to avoid court proceedings and argument about how much the other person is worth if it all ends?

No, that will not necessarily protect you either. If you look at the definition of a de-facto relationship, living together is only one of the things the court will take into consideration. A de-facto relationship may still exist based on the other considerations, such as the duration of the relationship, if a sexual relationship existed, the degree of financial interdependence and the reputation and public aspect of the relationship, to name but a few.

Practically this means it is possible for a marriage and de-facto relationship to co-exist (perhaps not in harmony or with the other person being aware of it).

We understand this is not welcome news to someone who has been burnt once, but it is critical you know what to expect going forward in a new relationship.

There are some who believe in signing a pre nup before living together, but that is another topic for another day.

On a philosophical note, if you have fallen in love again and part of you feels like you have jumped off the cliff, enjoy the free fall. You never know, it might work out this time.

Perhaps you will take some comfort in the following:

From Alfred Lord Tennyson's poem In Memoriam:27, 1850:
I hold it true, whate'er befall;
I feel it, when I sorrow most;
'Tis better to have loved and lost
Than never to have loved at all.
http://www.phrases.org.uk/meanings/62650.html